last update June 23rd - please scroll down in the article and read!
However, at Amidaji temple we’ll never follow these Japanese customs. Now the Hondo (main hall/Dharma Hall) is small, but even when it will be bigger, there will be no naijin or special area for priests.
When priests conduct services or give a Dharma
talk they will be at the same level with lay people. This is because,
although the priest and teacher may be useful in leading people to shinjin
(faith in Amida Buddha), actually the shinjin of the priest and that of the lay
person, as well as salvation, comes only from Amida Buddha.
Also, priests who chant hymns and conduct religious
services will face the altar. Sometimes, in Jodo Shinshu temples in Japan or
elsewhere, priests chant facing each other, but we’ll not do this at Amidaji.
Of course, teaching will be done facing the audience.
Next, the main object of worship, that is, Amida statue or image (the bigger, the better), will never be put in a box, but only on the table altar, so that it can be easily seen and venerated by all people in the audience. I think its of utmost importance that Amida statue can be seen and approached by devotees. People should be able to come close to it, put flowers and incense, touch it, etc. I do not understand why there is this custom that only priests enter the altar area, and lay people are not allowed. It really has no scriptural support, and is not faithful to the spirit of Shinran's teaching and Amida Buddha's indiscriminative Compassion.
UPDATE: June 23rd 2018:
There
was a commentary on this post made by somebody very much in love with Japanese style
temples, and who thought that I started an attack on them, when my goal was to
simply say that I chose to not follow some Japanese customs for their lack of usefulness.
He said:
“The
purpose of the naijin in Jodo Shinshu temples isn't to say that the priests are
on a higher level than the laypeople. That would be nonsensical, as there are
commonly priests in the audience as well! Rather, the naijin creates a raised
space so that everyone can clearly see the liturgy and objects of worship.
Gasshou”
This was my answer: I did not say that the “purpose” of naijin is to place priests higher
than laypeople. However, this is what it actually happens, even if they did not
intend that. Because naijin is a special elevated place reserved for priests
only it creates a separation which has no scriptural support. The fact that in
a big gathering there is not enough space in the naijin and some priests stay
in the geijin is NO argument against the fact that naijin is especially made
for priests only, again with NO doctrinal support! Also the naijin does not
help lay people see the image of Amida Buddha as they are very far from it in
the gejin. I went to many Japanese temples and in fact, the naijin prevented me
to see all the objects of worship when I stayed in the gejin! I and many other
non-japanese felt frustration in Japanese style temples, because we cannot see
Amida very clearly due to that highly decorated box and altar in the naijin,
and that cloth on His face and because of the distance. Also, sometimes when
the temple is still opened for visitors but there is no service, the box where
Amida stands is closed. Also, the space dedicated to naijin is closed by a big
decorated screen.
I
prefer temples where the statue or image can "breathe" , be
accessible and open all the time for devotees to come closer, watch it, and
venerate it. The Japanese style may work for Japanese, but it does not work for
many others and if we want to make Jodo Shinshu universal and appealing to all
we should be opened to change some Japanese customs if we consider them not useful
(attention here, I don't speak about doctrinal change, but only some Japanese
customs!). Devotional atmosphere is very important in a faith oriented school
like ours and it cannot be created for all if we put Amida in a box and in a
naijin so far from public eyes.
If
you want a japanese style temple in your town, then make one (I know you are a
big fan of Japanese style), I respect that choice, but I at Amidaji I will not
do that.
I
did not attack Japanese temples through my post, its fine if it works for some
people, especially for Japanese religiosity, but I think that their style is
not very useful for the purpose of spreading Jodo Shinshu outside of Japan. I
came to this conclusion in 15 years experience of active priesthood and after
meeting and talking with many people, especially non-japanese. Generally
speaking, people like big statues and images which are accessible to them and
can be seen clearly from all temple area. Namo Amida
Bu
0 comentarii:
Post a Comment