For me the words of the sutras and the Masters are supreme,
the story told by Shakyamuni about Amida is the true Dharma, while for others
the 'Dharma' is a continuous process of change and adaptation to their
unenlightened minds, personal beliefs or opinions. So, what can we talk or
debate about here? I accept the actual and literal existence of Amida Buddha
and His Pure Land, while they think of them as metaphors, symbols or even
compare Amida with a fictional character. It is like we live on different
planets. What can we really discuss about?
The truth is that unless one is ready to empty his cup of
personal interpretations, there is no reason to talk with him or her about
Amida Dharma. The karma of some fake followers is simply not ripe for true listening as even when they
read or hear the Dharma they listen only to the noise of their own minds. They
have no devotion and treat the Dharma like property, not like the supreme
medicine given by the Buddha. So what can we talk or debate about?
I have always said it and will continue to say it - the Amida Dharma is not debatable because
it is THE DHARMA. You can debate on any worldly matter and agree or disagree,
change this or that, etc, but you cannot debate on the Dharma, because the Dharma is the supramundane Path taught
by the Buddha. As long as you do not
have a supramundane or enlightened mind, you are in no position to debate or
change the Dharma. Unenlightened beings should instead approach the Amida
Dharma with awe, devotion and faith, as Shakyamuni instructed us to accept His Larger Sutra:
“You should single heartedly
accept in faith, uphold, and chant this sutra, and practice in accordance with
its teachings”.
“I have expounded this
teaching (sutra) for the sake of sentient beings and enabled you to see
Amitayus (Amida) and all in His Land. Strive to do what you should. After I
have passed into Nirvana, do not allow doubt to arise.”
Mind you, the Jodo Shinshu is not a Dharma gate of smart
koans[1] or of
doubting everything until you reach satori, but the Dharma Gate of Faith.
Please do not confuse the various Dharma Gates taught by the Buddha, because
what applies to one Dharma gate, it does nor apply to another. The various
teachings of self-power schools do NOT apply to the Dharma Gate of the Pure
Land where the key element is listening with devotion and accept in faith. If one really thinks that this Dharma Gate is not for him, it is better to leave it
than trying to transform it to suit his doubts.
As a priest I am always here to help, and I want so much to
help others receive faith. But I cannot help those who do not want to hear the
Dharma as it is - I mean, as it was taught by Shakyamuni and the Masters. I
cannot help people who lack devotion to hear and understand a Dharma Gate which
is based on devotion and faith. As Shinran said:
"It is also beyond my powers to correct others who do not have the same mind. Since people are not of the same mind, it is useless to say one thing or another." (Mattosho, Letter 6)
"It is also beyond my powers to correct others who do not have the same mind. Since people are not of the same mind, it is useless to say one thing or another." (Mattosho, Letter 6)
Far from me to say that people with doubts should not
approach Amida Dharma! On the contrary, they should and must approach it! But
while acknowledging their doubts they must accept that the Dharma is what
Shakyamuni and the Masters taught, and resist their tendency to change it
because they doubt it.
I am available anytime, and ready to help and support people
with doubts if they have the will to listen and solve those doubts, but I
cannot help people with both doubts and arrogance. The first can be saved because although
they have doubts, they are in a learning mood, and they accept that the Dharma
is different from their personal opinions, while the later cannot be saved
because they think the Dharma should be changed to accomodate their doubts or
personal opinions. The first want to discuss about the Dharma, while the latter
want only debates, that is, to promote their egocentric visions to
others. Master Shinran and Rennyo encouraged sincere Dharma discussions in
which people can acknowledge their doubts, chose between true and wrong
understanding, and be helped to receive faith, but were against debates where
only the noise of ego can be heard.
Here are a few well known passages for reflection:
"Each of those
lacking faith should by all means raise their doubts and discuss what it is to have faith or be
without it".
" In brief, it is
essential that each of those lacking faith have discussions of faith with one another from now on".
"The meetings are
occasions when, even if only once a month, just those who practice the nembutsu
should at least gather in the meeting place and discuss their own faith and the faith of others. Recently, however,
because matters of faith are never
discussed in terms of right and wrong, the situation is deplorable beyond
words.
In conclusion, there
must definitely be discussions of faith
from now on among those at the meetings. For this is how we are to attain birth
in the true and real land of Utmost Bliss".
(Rennyo Shonin, Letters)
"Regardless of
our doubts, if we listen intently with our entire being, we will be given
shinjin because of Great Compassion. The Buddhist teaching begins and ends in
hearing."
(Thus I Have Heard from Rennyo Shonin)
"What I have been
saying to all of you from many years past has not changed. Simply achieve your
birth, firmly avoiding all scholarly
debate".
Shinran Shonin, Letters
Also Shinran related the contrast between Master Honen's
encounter with people opened to Amida Dharma and those having their minds
closed and focused on debates:
"I remember him (Master Honen) smile and say, as he watched humble people of no intellectual pretensions
coming to visit him, 'Without doubt their birth is settled.' And I heard him
say after a visit by a man brilliant in
letters and debating, 'I really wonder about his birth.' To this day these
things come to mind."
Clearly, those who
are focused on debates do not even think there is something wrong with their
understanding, so for them, there are no doubts to be solved. According to
Rennyo Shonin, they are in the category of those who "lack good from the past". In one of his letters he described such people as false
followers which are incapable to detach themselves from their wrong views:
"These days, as in the past,
it seems that many of those who call themselves followers of the Buddha-Dharma
and extol and proclaim the teaching in various places in the provinces are
themselves not truly grounded in the right teaching of our tradition. When we
ask the reason for this, the answer is that in the first place, although they act
as if they knew the Buddha-Dharma in depth, no part of their understanding has
been gained from authentic sources. Some have heard the teaching quite by
chance, from the edge of a veranda or from outside a sliding door; their
aspiration for the Buddha-Dharma is in truth shallow, and they think there is
no one who knows better than they what the Buddha-Dharma is all about.
Consequently, when they happen to see
people who proclaim our tradition's right teaching in the correct manner, they
cling persistently to their own biased views. "
and with whom the Amida Dharma should not be
discussed, much less debated:
"When we consider presenting
our tradition's Other-Power faith, we must first distinguish between the people
who have good from the past and those who lack good from the past. For, however
long ago a person may have listed his name as a participant in this tradition, it will be difficult for one who lacks good
from the past to attain faith. Indeed, faith will of itself be decisively
settled in the person for whom past good has unfolded. And so, when we discuss
the two [kinds of] practices - right and sundry - in the presence of people who
lack good from the past, this may lay
the foundation for slander, contrary to what one would expect. To teach
extensively in the presence of ordinary people without understanding this
principle of the presence or absence of good from the past is in total
opposition to our tradition's rules of conduct.
Hence the Larger
Sutra says, 'If a person lacks roots of good, he will not be able to
hear this sutra' and 'to hear this sutra
and to sustain faith (shingyō)
are the most difficult of all difficulties; nothing surpasses these
difficulties".
It is
clear now why the modernists or so called, "progressive Buddhists"
cannot accept the story of Amida Buddha in the Larger Sutra, and why they call Amida a myth, metaphor, symbol or fictional character. It is clear why
they cannot take into consideration the fact that ALL the audience gathered
together at the Vulture Peak to hear this sutra actually saw Amida Buddha and
His Pure Land:
“I have expounded this
teaching (sutra) for the sake of sentient beings and enabled you to see
Amitayus (Amida) and all in His Land. Strive to do what you should. After I
have passed into Nirvana, do not allow doubt to arise.” (Shakyamuni Buddha)
Indeed, what
can be said to such people, and what debates or so called
"discussions" can a person of true faith really have with them? We
should clearly follow the advice of our Masters and step aside, leting them
experience the full extent of their wrong attitude in the hope that one day,
better sooner than later, they will realize their mistakes and enter that
learning mood which will help them to solve their doubts.
Believe me, that I engaged many times in endless talks with closed
minds, trying to open them like one opens a sealed tin can, and instead of helping, our so called 'discussion' became more and more a "foundation for slander" (as Rennyo described it) on their part. When one does not realize he needs help and does not ask for
help in solving his doubts, no ammount of scholarship or wise debates will make
his mind open.
So, again, my heart advice is this - stay away from debates
and try your best to help those who really want to be helped.
[1] Koan is a word or a phrase
of nonsensical language which cannot be “solved” by the intellect. It is used
as an exercise to break through the limitations of conventional thought and to
develop intuition, giving the practitioner the chance to reach an awareness
beyond duality. They are used as meditation objects in Rinzai Zen. However,
very often these koans are treated by many as mere intellectual interesting
games, loosing in this way their original function.
1 comentarii:
This clears up much confusion.
Thanks Rev. Josho :)
Post a Comment